Parenting style and empathy in youth A three-level meta-analysis

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2021
Host editors
  • D. Jolliffe
  • D.P. Farrington
Book title Empathy versus offending, aggression and bullying
Book subtitle Advancing knowledge using the Basic Empathy Scale
ISBN
  • 9780367253745
  • 9780367521455
ISBN (electronic)
  • 9780429287459
Series Routledge Studies in Criminal Behaviour
Chapter 4
Pages (from-to) 43-60
Publisher London: Routledge
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Research Institute of Child Development and Education (RICDE)
Abstract
A three-level meta-analysis was conducted to examine the association between parenting style (authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful parenting) and empathy in youth. The overall effect size that was based on 65 effect sizes extracted from 14 studies with a total sample size of 2,504 participants, was r = .171 (p < .001), indicating a modest positive association between parenting style and empathy. Moderator analyses showed that only authoritative parenting was positively associated with empathy (r = .232, p < .001). The association between parenting and cognitive empathy (r = .348, p <.001) and between parenting and affective empathy (r = .240, p <.01) were both significant, whereas no significant association was found between parenting and empathy in general (r = .086, ns). Further, a significant association between parenting and empathy was found for middle (r = .161, p <.01) and high (r = .188, p <.001) socio-economic status (SES) of the family but not for low family SES (r = .033, ns). Assessment type of parenting style was a significant moderator, with only questionnaire assessments yielding a significant effect size (r = .217, p <.001) in contrast to observations (r = .026, ns) and composite measures (r = .112, ns). Finally, somewhat larger effect sizes were found in studies that were more recently published. Regarding empathy in youth, it is concluded that the authoritative parenting style is the most successful. However, the results of this meta-analysis are considered as preliminary.
Document type Chapter
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287459-5
Downloads
Heynen et al. (2021a) (Accepted author manuscript)
10.4324_9780429287459-5_chapterpdf (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back