What Critical Media Studies Should Not Take from Actor-Network Theory
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2017 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Applying Actor-Network Theory in Media Studies |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Series | Advances in media, entertainment, and the arts (AMEA) book series |
| Pages (from-to) | 66-78 |
| Publisher | Hershey, PA: IGI Global |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
While supportive towards a certain rapprochement between media studies and Actor-Network Theory (ANT) this chapter identi es three main characteristics of the Latourian enterprise that critical media studies should avoid if it wants to remain its critical edge: 1. a methodological descriptivism that relies on the victor’s account, 2. a rejection of the notion of structure, and 3. an innovative yet limited notion of intellectual work. The chapter next articulates a perspective on how a “weak” version of ANT can augment critical media studies while retaining the latter’s strong dedication to changing an unjust social order.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0616-4.ch005 |
| Permalink to this page | |