Current evidence on chlorhexidine, toothpaste, gels, and mouthwashes
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2015 |
| Journal | International Journal of Evidence-Based Practice for the Dental Hygienist |
| Volume | Issue number | 1 | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 32-37 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
The universal advice from dental care professionals is to brush twice daily with a fluoride dentifrice. It would be ideal to incorporate an effective antimicrobial agent such as chlorhexidine (CHX) in a
dentifrice formulation. CHX dentifrice can be successfully formulated and will inhibit plaque growth to some degree but not to the same extent as a CHX mouthwash. A low-dosage 0.12% CHX dentifrice gel, which is available in Europe, was the subject of two clinical research projects. The dentifrice gel appeared to be as effective as a regular dentifrice in the prevention of plaque accumulation. However, it was considered as a poor alternative for a dentifrice because it is does not contain fluoride. Systematic evaluation of the available literature shows that when daily oral hygiene cannot be performed, CHX mouthwash is the first product of choice. When comparing 0.2% with 0.12% CHZ, a small but significant difference in plaque scores was observed in favor of the higher concentration. A CHX mouthwash can be used in conjunction with a regular fluoride toothpaste. Combining CHX mouthwash with an oxygenating agent mouthwash reduces teh well-known side effect of tooth discoloration. |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.11607/ebh.001506 |
| Published at | http://www.quintpub.com/journals/ebpdh/preview/EBH2015_1.html#p=36 |
| Permalink to this page | |
