Picky predicates: why believe doesn't like interrogative complements, and other puzzles
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 06-2019 |
| Journal | Natural Language Semantics |
| Volume | Issue number | 27 | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 95-134 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
It is a long-standing puzzle why predicates like believe embed declarative but not interrogative complements (e.g., Bill believes that/*whether Mary left) and why predicates like wonder embed interrogative but not declarative complements (e.g., Bill wonders whether/*that Mary left). This paper shows how the selectional restrictions of a range of predicates (neg-raising predicates like believe, truth-evaluating predicates like be true, inquisitive predicates like wonder, and predicates of dependency like depend on) can be derived from semantic assumptions that can be independently motivated.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-019-09152-9 |
| Downloads |
Theiler2019_Article_PickyPredicatesWhyBelieveDoesn
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
