Criteria for empirical theories of consciousness should focus on the explanatory power of mechanisms, not on functional equivalence

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2021
Journal Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume | Issue number 12 | 2
Pages (from-to) 93-94
Number of pages 2
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract

Doerig and colleagues put forward the notion that we need hard and theory-neutral criteria by which to arbitrate between empirical (mechanistic) theories of consciousness. However, most of the criteria that they propose are not theory neutral because they focus on functional equivalence between systems. Because empirical theories of consciousness are mechanistic rather than functionalist, we think these criteria are not helpful when arbitrating between them.

Document type Comment/Letter to the editor
Note Comment to: A. Doerig, A. Schurger, M.H. Herzog (2020). Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(1), 1–22
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470
Downloads
17588928.2020 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back