Criteria for empirical theories of consciousness should focus on the explanatory power of mechanisms, not on functional equivalence
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2021 |
| Journal | Cognitive Neuroscience |
| Volume | Issue number | 12 | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 93-94 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Doerig and colleagues put forward the notion that we need hard and theory-neutral criteria by which to arbitrate between empirical (mechanistic) theories of consciousness. However, most of the criteria that they propose are not theory neutral because they focus on functional equivalence between systems. Because empirical theories of consciousness are mechanistic rather than functionalist, we think these criteria are not helpful when arbitrating between them. |
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Note | Comment to: A. Doerig, A. Schurger, M.H. Herzog (2020). Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(1), 1–22 |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470 |
| Downloads |
17588928.2020
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
