Follow the trace Evaluating physical and digital forensic findings given activity level propositions using Bayesian networks
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Supervisors | |
| Award date | 11-11-2025 |
| ISBN |
|
| Number of pages | 337 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Forensic scientists face questions ranging from “What is the source of
this trace?” to more complex issues like “Who did what, when, where, and how?” These latter questions, known as “activity level questions,” become particularly challenging when they involve multiple types of traces, such as DNA traces and fibers. Evaluating the combined strength of evidence in these cases provides great value to the court but requires managing numerous probabilities arising from various uncertainties. Such complex casework requires structured probabilistic reasoning, and Bayesian networks prove to be valuable tools for this purpose. By using fictive case examples throughout this work, we advocate the benefits of the LR framework and Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic findings given activity level propositions across various disciplines— including digital forensic science. The result? A collection of “building blocks” representing general probabilistic forensic problems and two template Bayesian networks applicable to both mono- and interdisciplinary casework that map pathways from alleged activities to traces found on items of interest (i.e., “Follow the trace”). Additionally, two use cases in digital forensic science are presented: one involving iPhone Health app data and another addressing Trojan horse defense cases. This work aims to serve as a valuable reference for forensic scientists in their casework and research while also providing useful insights for other professionals in the forensic and legal fields. |
| Document type | PhD thesis |
| Language | English |
| Downloads |
Thesis (complete)
(Embargo up to 2027-07-01)
Chapter 7: Formulating propositions in Trojan horse defense cases
(Embargo up to 2027-07-01)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
