No robust relation between larger cities and depression
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 11-01-2022 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
| Article number | e2118943118 |
| Volume | Issue number | 119 | 2 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
“Larger cities provide a buffer against depression”—this astounding statement is from a PNAS article by Stier et al. (1) on how depression rates scale with the population of metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). It is astounding as it runs contrary to a wealth of psychological and epidemiological research showing the complex nature of depression and the detrimental influence of cities (2⇓–4). This conflict with prior research makes it paramount to study the quality of the evidence. In this letter we carry out this task by considering the robustness of the finding. Our analysis suggests that their data do not support their conclusion.
|
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Note | Comment to: A.J. Stier, K.E. Schertz, N.W. Rim, C. Cardenas-Iniguez, B.B. Lahey, L.M.A. Bettencourt, M.G. Berman (2021) Evidence and theory for lower rates of depression in larger US urban areas. PNAS 118 (31) e2022472118. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118943118 |
| Downloads |
e2118943118.full
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
