Climate change governance by central banks in an era of interlocking crises

Open Access
Authors
  • Jacqueline Best
  • Matthew Paterson
  • Ilias Alami
  • Daniel Bailey
  • Sarah Bracking
  • Jeremy Green
  • Eric Helleiner
  • James Jackson
  • Paul Langley
  • Sylvain Maechler
  • John Morris
  • Stine Quorning
  • Adrienne Roberts
  • Jens van ’t Klooster ORCID logo
  • Robert Watt
  • Stanley Wilshire
Publication date 2026
Journal Environmental Politics
Volume | Issue number 35 | 3
Pages (from-to) 595-621
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract
In this article, we survey the literature on central bank action on climate change, focusing particularly on how the combined crises of COVID-19, inflation, and Ukraine have affected this action. We argue that the current situation is a critical juncture in which recent crises have created a highly indeterminate situation regarding what central banks might do regarding climate change. To date, some central banks have used these crises as opportunities for expanding their role while others have succumbed to pressure to withdraw from climate action. We explore three dynamics that generate this openness to various potential trajectories for climate action: competing interpretations of inflation’s implications for climate policy; shifting forms of expertise within central banks; and attempts at global coordination of central bank activity. We then argue that how this critical juncture is resolved depends critically on national variations in the institutional character of central banks and their political context.
Document type Review article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2025.2481713
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008437902
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back