Elias and Bourdieu
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2012 |
| Journal | Journal of Classical Sociology |
| Volume | Issue number | 12 | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 69-93 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
The primary goal of this article is to uncover the deep-seated conceptual affinities between Pierre Bourdieu and Norbert Elias. The second goal is to demonstrate that, in part because of their diverging sensitivities, when taken together the two authors’ highly compatible approaches yield a vision more fertile than either of their sociological perspectives considered separately. Tracing the intellectual roots of the two author’s three core concepts - habitus, field/figuration, and power/capital - we show how they selectively appropriated from their predecessors. We then outline how each of the two authors used their overlapping triadic approaches to interrogate a range of empirical phenomena. Attempting to make the authors’ unexploited complementarity more tangible, we reflect on a simultaneously Elias- and Bourdieu-inspired approach to the body-centred world of sport. The conclusion argues that looking back at Elias and Bourdieu’s theoretical contributions together can revitalize our conceptualizing and investigating of human societies in the future.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | This article was originally published as ‘Elias and Bourdieu’ by Bowen Paulle, Bart van Heerikhuizen, and Mustafa Emirbayer, in The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, edited by Simon Susan and Bryan S. Turner (London: Anthem Press, 2011) |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X11433708 |
| Permalink to this page | |