Training needs for research in health inequities among health and demographic researchers from eight African and Asian countries

Open Access
Authors
  • H. Ramroth
  • J. Kinsman
Publication date 2014
Journal BMC Public Health
Article number 1254
Volume | Issue number 14
Pages (from-to) 1254
Number of pages 12
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS)
Abstract
Background: Health equity is a global policy priority. To support this policy in low and middle income countries, more evidence and analysis of the social determinants of health inequalities is needed. This requires specific know how among researchers. The INDEPTH Training and Research Centres of Excellence (INTREC) collaboration aims to provide training on the social determinants of health approach for health researchers from the International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (INDEPTH) in Africa and Asia. Training is more effective if it is relevant to learners and their work. As a first stage of INTREC, this qualitative study,therefore, explored what INDEPTH researchers from Ghana, Tanzania, South Africa, Kenya, Indonesia, India, Vietnam, and Bangladesh may want to learn to be able to conduct research on the causes of health inequalities in their country.

Methods: Using online concept-mapping, participants were asked to generate statements in response to the question what background knowledge they would need to conduct research on the causes of health inequality in their country, to sort those statements into thematic groups, and to rate them in terms of how important it would be for the INTREC program to offer instruction on each of the statements. Statistical techniques were used to structure statements into a thematic cluster map and average importance ratings of statements/clusters were calculated.

Results: Of the 150 invited researchers, 82 participated in the study; 54 from Africa; 28 from Asia. Participants generated 59 statements and sorted them into 6 broader thematic clusters: "assessing health inequalities"; "research design and methods"; "research and policy"; "demography and health inequalities"; "social determinants of health" and "interventions". African participants assigned the highest importance to further training on assessing health inequalities. Asian participants assigned the highest importance to training on research and policy.

Conclusion: The identified thematic clusters and statements provide a detailed understanding of what INDEPTH researchers want to learn in order to be able to conduct research on the social determinants of health inequalities. This offers a framework for developing capacity building programs in this emerging field of public health research.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1254
Downloads
traing needs (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back