Evaluation of heat treatments, different from those currently established in the EU legislation, that could be applied to live bivalve molluscs from B and C production areas, that have not been submitted to purification or relaying, in order to eliminate pathogenic microorganisms
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 12-2015 |
| Journal | EFSA Journal |
| Article number | 4332 |
| Volume | Issue number | 13 | 2 |
| Number of pages | 76 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
EU rules state that unpurified live bivalve molluscs from B and C
production areas must undergo specified heat treatment to eliminate
pathogenic microorganisms. Alternative time-temperature conditions were
evaluated to the permitted treatment of at least 90°C for at least 90
seconds (s) in the mollusc flesh. The most important viral hazards
associated with bivalve molluscs were identified as Norovirus (NoV) and
Hepatitis A virus (HAV). A HAV thermal inactivation model was developed
to identify equivalent (achieve the same log reduction) time-temperature
combinations to 90°C for 90 s. The model was based on HAV inactivation
data in mollusc matrices during isothermal heat treatment and estimated
the z-value as 27.5°C. Evaluation against inactivation in whole bivalve
molluscs showed that the observed HAV inactivation is in general higher
than predicted. Under the conditions and matrices studied HAV is
generally more heat tolerant than NoV surrogates. The model provided
alternative processes equivalent to 90°C for 90 s without considering
the effect of heat-up and cool-down times on virus inactivation. As
confirmed by industrial profiles, there is a heat-up and cool-down time
that will enhance the safety of the final product and can lead to
variations in HAV reduction depending on the process design. This shows
the need for a Performance Criterion (PC) for the whole process, which
is the required log reduction during heat treatment. A risk assessment
model was developed and a case study illustrated the relationship
between a PC and the HAV risk at consumption. If risk managers establish
an ALOP, this can be translated to a PC and a Process Criterion (PrC).
It is demonstrated that a PrC expressed as an F-value (the equivalent
processing time of a hypothetical isothermal process at a reference
temperature) is more appropriate than the currently used
time-temperature combination since it takes into account non-isothermal
conditions.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4332 |
| Downloads |
Evaluation
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |