Literature Review of the Role of Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for the Treatment of Traumatic Splenic Injuries

Open Access
Authors
  • C.H. van der Vlies
  • O.M. van Delden
  • B.J. Punt
  • K.J. Ponsen
Publication date 2010
Journal Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Volume | Issue number 33 | 6
Pages (from-to) 1079-1087
Organisations
  • Faculty of Medicine (AMC-UvA)
Abstract
Introduction The spleen is the second most frequently injured organ following blunt abdominal trauma Trends in management have changed over the years Traditionally, laparotomy and,splenectomy was the standard management Presently, nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injury is the most common management strategy in hemodynamically stable patients Splenic injuries can be managed via simple observation (OBS) or with angiography and embolization (AE) Angio-embolization has shown to be a valuable alternative to observational management and has increased the success rate of nonoperative management in many series Diagnostics Improved imaging techniques and advances in interventional radiology have led to a better selection of patients who are amenable to nonoperative management Despite this, there is still a lot of debate about which patients are prone to NOM Angiography and Embolization The optimal patient selection is still a matter of debate and the role of CT and angio-embolization has not yet fully evolved We discuss the role of sonography and CT features, such as contrast extravasation, pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, or hemoperitoneum, to determine the optimal patient selection for angiography and embolization We also review the efficiency technical considerations (proximal or selective embolization), logistics and complication rates of AE for blunt traumatic splenic injuries
Document type Article
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9943-6
Downloads
341715.pdf (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back