On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation

Authors
Publication date 1999
Journal Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume | Issue number 25 | 3
Pages (from-to) 348-362
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
  • Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB)
Abstract
The relationship between dispositional need for cognitive closure (NFC) and the use of heuristics in negotiation was investigated. In Study 1 (N = 147), negotiators with high NFC were more influenced by focal points when setting limits and making concessions than were negotiators with low NFC. In Study 2 (N = 74), negotiators with high NFC were more influenced by stereotypic information when making concessions than were negotiators with low NFC. Study 3 examined whether results could be attributed to a correlation between NFC and social value orientation ?the dispositional tendency to approach the negotation in a prosocial or more selfish way. In three different samples, no such relationship was found. The use of heuristics in negotiation is moderated by need for cognitive closure, and this effect is most likely due to the fact that negotiators with low need for closure are less likely to seize and freeze on information.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003007
Permalink to this page
Back