| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
2019
|
| Journal |
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|
| Article number |
e9
|
| Volume | Issue number |
42
|
| Pages (from-to) |
18-19
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
|
| Abstract |
Borsboom et al.'s formulation provides an opportunity for a fundamental rethink about the "brain disease model" of addiction that dominates research, treatment, policy, and lay understanding of addiction. We also demonstrate how the American opioid crisis provides a contemporary example of how "brain disease" is not moderated by the environmental context but is instead crucially dependent upon it.
|
| Document type |
Comment/Letter to the editor
|
| Note |
Open peer commentary to: D. Borsboom, A.O.J. Cramer, A. Kalis (2019) Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42:e2.
|
| Language |
English
|
| Related publication |
Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research
|
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18001024
|
|
Permalink to this page
|
