Adverse events of local treatment in long term head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma survivors after external beam radiotherapy or AMORE treatment

Authors
  • R.A. Schoot
  • O. Slater
  • C.M. Ronckers
  • A.H. Zwinderman
  • A.J.M. Balm
  • B. Hartley
  • M.W. van den Brekel ORCID logo
  • S. Gupta
  • P. Saeed
  • E. Gajdosova
  • B.R. Pieters
  • M.N. Gaze
  • H.C. Mandeville
  • R. Davila Fajardo
  • Y.C. Chang
  • J.E. Gains
  • S.D. Strackee
  • D. Dunaway
  • C. Abela
  • C. Mason
  • L.E. Smeele
  • J.C. Chisholm
  • G.A. Levitt
  • L.C.M. Kremer
  • M.A. Grootenhuis
  • H. Maurice-Stam
  • C.A. Stiller
  • P. Hammond
  • H.N. Caron
  • J.H.M. Merks
Publication date 07-2015
Journal European Journal of Cancer
Volume | Issue number 51 | 11
Pages (from-to) 1424-1434
Organisations
  • Faculty of Dentistry (ACTA)
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
  • Faculty of Medicine (AMC-UvA)
Abstract
Background
Radiotherapy is a well-known cause of adverse events (AEs). To reduce AEs, an innovative local treatment was developed in Amsterdam: Ablative surgery, MOuld brachytherapy and surgical REconstruction (AMORE).

Aims: (1) to determine the prevalence of AEs in HNRMS survivors and (2) to compare AEs between survivors treated with the international standard: external beam radiotherapy (EBRT-based: London) and survivors treated with AMORE if feasible, otherwise EBRT (AMORE-based: Amsterdam).

Methods
All HNRMS survivors, treated in London or Amsterdam between January 1990 and December 2010 (n = 153), and alive ⩾2 years post-treatment were eligible (n = 113). A predefined list of AEs was assessed in a multidisciplinary clinic and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Results
Eighty HNRMS survivors attended the clinic (median follow-up 10.5 years); 63% experienced ⩾1 severe or disabling event, and 76% had ⩾5 AEs (any grade). Survivors with EBRT-based treatment were, after adjustment for site, age at diagnosis, and follow-up duration, at increased risk to develop any grade 3/4 event or ⩾5 AEs (any grade) compared with survivors with AMORE-based treatments (p = 0.032 and 0.01, respectively). Five year overall survival (source population) after EBRT-based treatment was 75.0%, after AMORE-based treatment 76.9%, p = 0.56.

Conclusion
This study may serve as a baseline inventory and can be used in future studies for prospective assessments of AEs following the introduction of novel local treatment modalities. AMORE-based local treatment resulted in similar overall survival and a reduction of AEs secondary to local treatment.
Document type Article
Note With supplementary data
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.02.010
Permalink to this page
Back