Author’s Response
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 05-2019 |
| Journal | Labor, Studies in Working-Class History |
| Volume | Issue number | 16 | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 71-76 |
| Organisations |
|
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Note | Reply to: E. Boris (2019) Beyond Separate Spheres. Labor 16 (2): 43–47; and: M. Lake (2019) Geneva (ILO) Conventions: Located but Not Made There. Labor 16 (2): 49–54; and: J.M. Palacio (2019) The ILO and Latin America: The Hidden Transcript of the Good Old Lady. Labor 16 (2): 55–63: and: G. Rodgers (2019) The ILO at 100: Reflections on Marcel van der Linden’s Critique. Labor 16 (2): 65–70. |
| Language | English |
| Related publication | The International Labour Organization, 1919–2019: An Appraisal |
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-7323661
(Final published version)
|
| Published at |
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/724631
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |