Pitfalls in the evaluation of argumentation in the legislative process

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2007
Host editors
  • H.V. Hansen
  • C.W. Tindale
  • J.A. Blair
  • R.H. Johnson
  • D.M. Godden
Book title Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007
ISBN
  • 9780968346150
Event Dissensus & The Search for Common Ground
Publisher Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
Abstract The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation of legislative decisions. In this contribution I will discuss shortcomings in the application of the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory for the analysis and evaluation of the argumentation in a parliamentary debate op the penalization of stalking. The case illustrates that institutional preconditions of a specific type of debate should be taken into account in order to be able to give an adequate analysis of these debates.
Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Published at http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA7/papersandcommentaries/118/
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back