Feature binding is slow Temporal integration explains apparent ultrafast binding
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 08-2024 |
| Journal | Journal of Vision |
| Article number | 3 |
| Volume | Issue number | 24 | 8 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Visual perception involves binding of distinct features into a unified percept. Although traditional theories link feature binding to time-consuming recurrent processes, Holcombe and Cavanagh (2001) demonstrated ultrafast, early binding of features that belong to the same object. The task required binding of orientation and luminance within an exceptionally short presentation time. However, because visual stimuli were presented over multiple presentation cycles, their findings can alternatively be explained by temporal integration over the extended stimulus sequence. Here, we conducted three experiments manipulating the number of presentation cycles. If early binding occurs, one extremely short cycle should be sufficient for feature integration. Conversely, late binding theories predict that successful binding requires substantial time and improves with additional presentation cycles. Our findings indicate that task-relevant binding of features from the same object occurs slowly, supporting late binding theories. |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.8.3 |
| Other links | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85200530804 |
| Downloads |
i1534-7362-24-8-3_1722846353.6632
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
