CIT-PART: Report case study Netherlands

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 09-2011
Number of pages 77
Publisher Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract
In the mid 1990s, xenotransplantation – the process of grafting or transplanting organs or tissues between members of different species – was conceived of as a promising but risky new technology. At the end of that decade several governments in Europe asked their citizens for an opinion about xenotransplantation, while simultaneously acknowledging that it could take years before this technology would be feasible in medical practice. The way in which subsequently decisions were made, and the topic was regulated, varied greatly between countries. This report focuses on the way political judgment and decision-making on xenotransplantation developed in the Netherlands.
Document type Report
Note Contract Number: SSH-CT-2008-225327
Language English
Published at http://www.cit-part.at/CIT-PART%20Deliverable%2010_11.pdf
Downloads
CIT-PART_Deliverable_10_11.pdf (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back