First Validation of the Full PROMIS Pain Interference and Pain Behavior Item Banks in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Open Access
Authors
  • M.H.P. Crins
  • C.B. Terwee
  • R. Westhovens
  • D. van Schaardenburg
  • N. Smits
  • J. Joly
  • P. Verschueren
  • K. Van der Elst
  • J. Dekker
  • M. Boers
  • L.D. Roorda
Publication date 11-2020
Journal Arthritis Care & Research
Volume | Issue number 72 | 11
Pages (from-to) 1550-1559
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Research Institute of Child Development and Education (RICDE)
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pain interference and pain behavior are highly relevant outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMISĀ® ) is a universally applicable set of item-banks measuring patient-reported health, and, if applied as computerized adaptive tests (CATs), more efficiently and precisely than current instruments. The objective was to study the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) and the PROMIS Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB) item-banks in patients with RA.

METHODS: 2029 patients with RA completed the full PROMIS-PI (V1.1, 40-items) and 1554 patients the full PROMIS-PB (V1.1, 39-items). The following psychometric properties were studied: Unidimensionality, local dependence, monotonicity and Graded Response Model (GRM) fit, cross-cultural validity (Differential Item Functioning [DIF] for language [Dutch vs. Flemish]), other forms of measurement invariance, construct validity, reliability, and floor and ceiling effects.

RESULTS: The PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB banks were sufficiently unidimensional (Omega-H 0.99,0.95; ECV 0.95,0.78; respectively), had negligible local dependence (0.3%,1.4% of item-pairs), good monotonicity (H 0.75,0.46), and a good GRM model fit (no misfitting items). Furthermore, both item-banks showed good cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language), measurement invariance (no DIF for age, gender, administration mode and disease activity), good construct validity (all hypotheses met), high reliability (>0.90 in the range of patients with RA), and absence of floor and ceiling effects (0% minimum or maximum score, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Both PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB banks showed good psychometric properties in patients with RA and can be used as CAT in research and clinical practice.

Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24077
Downloads
acr.24077 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back