Unrestricted quantification and ranges of significance
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 06-2023 |
| Journal | Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | Issue number | 180 | 5-6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1579-1600 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Call a quantifier ‘unrestricted’ if it ranges over absolutely all objects. Arguably, unrestricted quantification is often presupposed in philosophical inquiry. However, developing a semantic theory that vindicates unrestricted quantification proves rather difficult, at least as long as we formulate our semantic theory within a classical first-order language. It has been argued that using a type theory as framework for our semantic theory provides a resolution of this problem, at least if a broadly Fregean interpretation of type theory is assumed. However, the intelligibility of this interpretation has been questioned. In this paper I introduce a type-free theory of properties that can also be used to vindicate unrestricted quantification. This alternative emerges very naturally by reflecting on the features on which the type-theoretic solution of the problem of unrestricted quantification relies. Although this alternative theory is formulated in a non-classical logic, it preserves the deductive strength of classical strict type theory in a natural way. The ideas developed in this paper make crucial use of Russell’s notion of range of significance. |
| Document type | Article |
| Note | In special issue: Paradox, Context, and Generality |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-01776-8 |
| Other links | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85123097595 |
| Downloads |
s11098-022-01776-8
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
