An examination of acquiescent response styles in cross-cultural research
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2009 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Quod erat demonstrandum: from Herodotus' ethnographic journeys to cross-cultural research: selected chapters from the 18th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology |
| ISBN |
|
| Event | 18th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology |
| Pages (from-to) | 137-147 |
| Publisher | Athens: Pedio Books Publishing |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Response styles constitute a formidable challenge for cross-cultural research. In this article, three different response styles are discussed (acquiescence, extremity scoring, and social desirability). Acquiescence responding (ARS) is then integrated into a larger classical test theoretical framework, which allows for an examination of the various roles that ARS may play in cross-cultural research. A new meta-analytical method is proposed to examine the prevalence and nature of ARS. Preliminary evidence suggests that ARS has only a small, but systematic effect on survey responses. Then meaning of ARS is explored through correlations with nation-level indicators. Implications for future research are discussed.
|
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Language | English |
| Published at | |
| Permalink to this page | |