An examination of acquiescent response styles in cross-cultural research

Authors
  • R. Fischer
  • J.R.J. Fontaine
  • F.J.R. van de Vijver
  • D.A. van Hemert
Publication date 2009
Host editors
  • A. Gari
  • K. Mylonas
Book title Quod erat demonstrandum: from Herodotus' ethnographic journeys to cross-cultural research: selected chapters from the 18th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology
ISBN
  • 9789609405072
Event 18th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology
Pages (from-to) 137-147
Publisher Athens: Pedio Books Publishing
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
Response styles constitute a formidable challenge for cross-cultural research. In this article, three different response styles are discussed (acquiescence, extremity scoring, and social desirability). Acquiescence responding (ARS) is then integrated into a larger classical test theoretical framework, which allows for an examination of the various roles that ARS may play in cross-cultural research. A new meta-analytical method is proposed to examine the prevalence and nature of ARS. Preliminary evidence suggests that ARS has only a small, but systematic effect on survey responses. Then meaning of ARS is explored through correlations with nation-level indicators. Implications for future research are discussed.
Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Published at
Permalink to this page
Back