Comparing Compact Codebooks for Visual Categorization
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2010 |
| Journal | Computer Vision and Image Understanding |
| Volume | Issue number | 114 | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 450-462 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In the face of current large-scale video libraries, the practical applicability of content-based indexing algorithms is constrained by their efficiency. This paper strives for efficient large-scale video indexing by comparing various visual-based concept categorization techniques. In visual categorization, the popular codebook model has shown excellent categorization performance. The codebook model represents continuous visual features by discrete prototypes predefined in a vocabulary. The vocabulary size has a major impact on categorization efficiency, where a more compact vocabulary is more efficient. However, smaller vocabularies typically score lower on classification performance than larger vocabularies. This paper compares four approaches to achieve a compact codebook vocabulary while retaining categorization performance. For these four methods, we investigate the trade-off between codebook compactness and categorization performance. We evaluate the methods on more than 200 h of challenging video data with as many as 101 semantic concepts. The results allow us to create a taxonomy of the four methods based on their efficiency and categorization performance.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2009.08.004 |
| Permalink to this page | |
