Redefine statistical significance

Authors
  • D.J. Benjamin
  • J.O. Berger
  • M. Johannesson
  • B.A. Nosek
  • E.J. Wagenmakers
  • R. Berk
  • K.A. Bollen
  • B. Brembs
  • L. Brown
  • C. Camerer
  • D. Cesarini
  • C.D. Chambers
  • M. Clyde
  • T.D. Cook
  • P. De Boeck
  • Z. Dienes
  • A. Dreber
  • K. Easwaran
  • C. Efferson
  • E. Fehr
  • F. Fidler
  • A.P. Field
  • M. Forster
  • E.I. George
  • R. Gonzalez
  • S. Goodman
  • E. Green
  • D.P. Green
  • A.G. Greenwald
  • J.D. Hadfield
  • L.V. Hedges
  • L. Held
  • T.H. Ho
  • H. Hoijtink
  • D.J. Hruschka
  • K. Imai
  • G. Imbens
  • J.P.A. Ioannidis
  • M. Jeon
  • J.H. Jones
  • M. Kirchler
  • D. Laibson
  • J. List
  • R. Little
  • A. Lupia
  • E. Machery
  • S.E. Maxwell
  • M. McCarthy
  • D.A. Moore
  • S.L. Morgan
  • M. Munafó
  • S. Nakagawa
  • B. Nyhan
  • T.H. Parker
  • L. Pericchi
  • Marco Perugini
  • J. Rouder
  • J. Rousseau
  • V. Savalei
  • F.D. Schönbrodt
  • T. Sellke
  • B. Sinclair
  • D. Tingley
  • T. Van Zandt
  • S. Vazire
  • D.J. Watts
  • C. Winship
  • R.L. Wolpert
  • Y. Xie
  • C. Young
  • J. Zinman
  • V.E. Johnson
Publication date 01-2018
Journal Nature Human Behaviour
Volume | Issue number 2 | 1
Pages (from-to) 6-10
Number of pages 5
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.
Document type Comment/Letter to the editor
Note With supplementary file.
Language English
Published at
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z (Final published version)
Other links
Permalink to this page
Back