Honest signalling in predator–prey interactions Testing the resource allocation hypothesis

Warning signals are honest if they reliably deliver information about prey unprofitability to predators. One potential mechanism that may create and maintain a positive relationship between the strength of signals and defence is the resource allocation between these costly traits. Here, we test this hypothesis using the wood tiger moth Arctia plantaginis, whose females' red hindwings are a warning signal to predators but show considerable variation in colouration within populations. These moths also produce a defensive chemical that is known to influence avian predator attack risk. Using dietary manipulations, image and chemical analyses, and experiments with ecologically relevant predators, we demonstrate that protein availability during development can influence the strength of both the primary warning signal and the secondary defence. Our results show that females raised on a high-protein or ad libitum natural diet produced more distasteful defensive fluids than those raised on a low-protein diet or subjected to periodic food deprivation. While the patterning of the warning signal was unaffected by food deprivation, its efficacy was diminished in moths raised on a low-protein diet. However, this change was imperceptible to avian predators. Critically, resource availability influenced the relationship between signal strength and defence: moths on a high-protein diet displayed a positive correlation between warning signal strength and unpalatability, whereas this correlation was absent in moths raised on a natural diet. These findings show that resource availability can weaken the reliability of warning signals as an indicator of an individual's defensive capabilities, highlighting the complex interplay between ecological conditions and the evolution of honest signalling.