Analysis of the INEX 2009 Ad Hoc Track results

This paper analyzes the results of the INEX 2009 Ad Hoc Track, focusing on a variety of topics. First, we examine in detail the relevance judgments. Second, we study the resulting system rankings, for each of the four ad hoc tasks, and determine whether differences between the best scoring participants are statistically significant. Third, we restrict our attention to particular run types: element and passage runs, keyword and phrase query runs, and systems using a reference run with a solid article ranking. Fourth, we examine the relative effectiveness of content only (CO, or Keyword) search as well as content and structure (CAS, or structured) search. Fifth, we look at the ability of focused retrieval techniques to rank articles. Sixth, we study the length of retrieved results, and look at the impact of restricting result length.