Shifts in phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in three cyanobacteria-dominated lakes after treatment with hydrogen peroxide
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 03-2024 |
| Journal | Harmful Algae |
| Article number | 102585 |
| Volume | Issue number | 133 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Cyanobacteria can reach high densities in eutrophic lakes, which may
cause problems due to their potential toxin production. Several methods
are in use to prevent, control or mitigate harmful cyanobacterial
blooms. Treatment of blooms with low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2) is a promising emergency method. However, effects of H2O2 on cyanobacteria, eukaryotic phytoplankton
and zooplankton have mainly been studied in controlled cultures and
mesocosm experiments, while much less is known about the effectiveness
and potential side effects of H2O2
treatments on entire lake ecosystems. In this study, we report on three
different lakes in the Netherlands that were treated with average H2O2 concentrations ranging from 2 to 5 mg L−1 to suppress cyanobacterial blooms. Effects on phytoplankton
and zooplankton communities, on cyanotoxin concentrations, and on
nutrient availability in the lakes were assessed. After every H2O2 treatment, cyanobacteria drastically declined, sometimes by more than 99%, although blooms of Dolichospermum sp., Aphanizomenon sp., and Planktothrix rubescens were more strongly suppressed than a Planktothrix agardhii bloom. Eukaryotic phytoplankton were not significantly affected by the H2O2
additions and had an initial advantage over cyanobacteria after the
treatment, when ample nutrients and light were available. In all three
lakes, a new cyanobacterial bloom developed within several weeks after
the first H2O2 treatment, and in two lakes a second H2O2 treatment was therefore applied to again suppress the cyanobacterial population. Rotifers strongly declined after most H2O2 treatments except when the H2O2 concentration was ≤ 2 mg L−1, whereas cladocerans were only mildly affected and copepods were least impacted by the added H2O2.
In response to the treatments, the cyanotoxins microcystins and
anabaenopeptins were released from the cells into the water column, but
disappeared after a few days. We conclude that lake treatments with low
concentrations of H2O2 can be a successful tool to
suppress harmful cyanobacterial blooms, but may negatively affect some
of the zooplankton taxa in lakes. We advise pre-tests prior to the
treatment of lakes to define optimal treatment concentrations that kill
the majority of the cyanobacteria and to minimize potential side effects
on non-target organisms. In some cases, the pre-tests may discourage
treatment of the lake.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | With supplementary file. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2024.102585 |
| Other links | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184076788 |
| Downloads |
1-s2.0-S1568988324000192-main
(Final published version)
|
| Supplementary materials | |
| Permalink to this page | |
