Fully Characterizing Lossy Catalytic Computation

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 02-2025
Host editors
  • Raghu Meka
Book title 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference
Book subtitle ITCS 2025, January 7-10, 2025, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
ISBN (electronic)
  • 9783959773614
Series Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics
Event 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, ITCS 2025
Article number 50
Number of pages 13
Publisher Saarbrücken/Wadern: Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
Organisations
  • Faculty of Science (FNWI) - Informatics Institute (IVI)
Abstract

A catalytic machine is a model of computation where a traditional space-bounded machine is augmented with an additional, significantly larger, “catalytic” tape, which, while being available as a work tape, has the caveat of being initialized with an arbitrary string, which must be preserved at the end of the computation. Despite this restriction, catalytic machines have been shown to have surprising additional power; a logspace machine with a polynomial length catalytic tape, known as catalytic logspace (CL), can compute problems which are believed to be impossible for L. A fundamental question of the model is whether the catalytic condition, of leaving the catalytic tape in its exact original configuration, is robust to minor deviations. This study was initialized by Gupta et al. (2024), who defined lossy catalytic logspace (LCL[e]) as a variant of CL where we allow up to e errors when resetting the catalytic tape. They showed that LCL[e] = CL for any e = O(1), which remains the frontier of our understanding. In this work we completely characterize lossy catalytic space (LCSPACE[s, c, e]) in terms of ordinary catalytic space (CSPACE[s, c]). We show that LCSPACE[s, c, e] = CSPACE[Θ(s + e log c), Θ(c)] In other words, allowing e errors on a catalytic tape of length c is equivalent, up to a constant stretch, to an equivalent errorless catalytic machine with an additional e log c bits of ordinary working memory. As a consequence, we show that for any e, LCL[e] = CL implies SPACE[e log n] ⊆ ZPP, thus giving a barrier to any improvement beyond LCL[O(1)] = CL. We also show equivalent results for non-deterministic and randomized catalytic space.

Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Published at
Downloads
LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.50 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back