The sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination to detect objective cognitive side-effects induced by electroconvulsive therapy results from the Dutch ECT Consortium

Open Access
Authors
  • Dore Loef
  • Philip F.P. van Eijndhoven
  • Sigfried N.T.M. Schouws
  • Arjen J.C. Slooter
  • Nikki Janssen
  • Rob M. Kok
  • Bart P.F. Rutten
  • Eric van Exel
  • Didi Rhebergen
  • Mardien L. Oudega
  • Roel J.T. Mocking
  • Indira Tendolkar
  • Annemiek Dols
  • Esmée Verwijk ORCID logo
  • Dutch ECT Consortium
Publication date December 2025
Journal Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging
Volume | Issue number 10 | 12
Pages (from-to) 1268-1275
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Monitoring cognitive side-effects following electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is crucial for balancing side-effects and clinical effectiveness. Unfortunately, evidence-based guidelines on cognitive testing following ECT are lacking. A frequently used test in global ECT practice is the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). We examined the change of the MMSE and its performance in identifying a decline in predefined neuropsychological measures sensitive to ECT-induced cognitive changes: verbal recall and verbal fluency.
METHODS: The mean MMSE scores pre- and one week post-ECT were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Reliable Change Index was calculated for all cognitive measures to indicate whether an individual's change score from pre- to post-ECT is considered statistically significant. The sensitivity and specificity of the MMSE were calculated.
RESULTS: 426 patients with depression from five sites were included from the Dutch ECT Consortium. The mean MMSE increased significantly from 26.2 (SD=3.9) pre-ECT to 26.8 (SD=3.8) post-ECT (p=0.002). 36 patients (8.5%) showed a significant decline in MMSE score post-ECT. The sensitivity of the MMSE in identifying patients who experienced a significant decline in verbal recall or verbal fluency ranged from 3.6% to 11.1%. The specificity of the MMSE in identifying patients who did not experience a significant decline in verbal recall or verbal fluency ranged from 95.6% to 96.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the very low sensitivity of the MMSE, we propose reconsidering the prominence of the MMSE in ECT practice and cognitive monitoring guidelines, advocating for a more comprehensive approach to assess ECT-induced cognitive changes.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.002 (Final published version)
Downloads
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back