Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority: a pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditions
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2014 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Argumentation and health |
| ISBN |
|
| Series | Benjamins current topics, 64 |
| Pages (from-to) | 33-50 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Publisher | Amsterdam: John Benjamins |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argue in support of a treatment advice to overcome a patient’s hesitance about it. In this argumentation, the doctor might explicitly present him- or herself as an authority, thereby presenting an argument by authority. Depending on the specific conditions under which the doctor advances such an argument, the doctor’s argument by authority can constitute a sound or a fallacious contribution to the discussion. In this chapter, I shall determine what the specific soundness conditions are that apply to a doctor’s argumentation by authority in medical consultation.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Note | Publ. before in: Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 1:1 (2012) |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.64.04pil |
| Permalink to this page | |