What Basic Emotion Theory Really Says for the Twenty-First Century Study of Emotion
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 06-2019 |
| Journal | Journal of Nonverbal Behavior |
| Volume | Issue number | 43 | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 195-201 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Basic emotion theory (BET) has been, perhaps, the central narrative in the science of emotion. As Crivelli and Fridlund (J Nonverbal Behav 125:1–34, 2019, this issue) would have it, however, BET is ready to be put to rest, facing “last stands” and “fatal” empirical failures. Nothing could be further from the truth. Crivelli and Fridlund’s outdated treatment of BET, narrow focus on facial expressions of six emotions, inattention to robust empirical literatures, and overreliance on singular “critical tests” of a multifaceted theory, undermine their critique and belie the considerable advances guided by basic emotion theory.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00298-y |
| Downloads |
10.1007_s10919-019-00298-y
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
