Proof-theoretic analysis of rationality for strategic games with arbitrary strategy sets

Authors
Publication date 2010
Host editors
  • J. Dix
  • J. Leite
  • G. Governatori
  • W. Jamroga
Book title Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems
Book subtitle 11th international workshop, CLIMA XI, Lisbon, Portugal, August 16-17, 2010 : proceedings
ISBN
  • 9783642149764
ISBN (electronic)
  • 9783642149771
Series Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Event 11th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA XI), Lisbon, Portugal
Pages (from-to) 186-199
Publisher Berlin: Springer
Organisations
  • Interfacultary Research - Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC)
Abstract
In the context of strategic games, we provide an axiomatic proof of the statement "Common knowledge of rationality implies that the players will choose only strategies that survive the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies." Rationality here means playing only strategies one believes to be best responses. This involves looking at two formal languages. One is first-order, and is used to formalise optimality conditions, like avoiding strictly dominated strategies, or playing a best response. The other is a modal fixpoint language with expressions for optimality, rationality and belief. Fixpoints are used to form expressions for common belief and for iterated elimination of non-optimal strategies.
Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14977-1_15
Permalink to this page
Back