Пассивное противостояние диамату на пути к онтологии и феноменологии: Имяславие и критическое неогумбольдтианство: русские религиозные философы и Густав Шпет = The passive opposition to dialectical materialism on the way to ontology and phenomenology: 'Imiaslavie' and critical neo-Humboldtianism: Russian religious philosophers and Gustav Shpet

Authors
Publication date 2008
Journal Russian Literature
Volume | Issue number 63 | 2-4
Pages (from-to) 293-366
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
Abstract
The article discusses the alternative order of "language criticism" as developed by the main representatives of Russian "religious" hesychast philosophy on the one hand and phenomenological "Neo-Humboldtianism" on the other. The article draws on the works written in the early and late twenties by Aleksei Losev, Sergii Bulgakov, Pavel Florenskii and Gustav Shpet and demonstrates their substantial alterity with regard to Stalin's philosophical ideology applied to language studies and general humanities. The main object of our study is the descriptive analysis of Russian "imiaslavie" together with Russian linguistic phenomenology debated through the perspective of European semiotics (Ferdinand de Saussure). The article strives to demonstrate the distinctiveness of these Russian intellectual traditions and their possible idiosyncrasy within the semiotic scientific paradigm.
Document type Article
Language Russian
Published at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruslit.2008.04.008
Permalink to this page
Back