Trading deforestation—why the legality of forest-risk commodities is insufficient

Open Access
Authors
  • C. West
  • R. Rajão
  • M. Napolitano Ferreira
  • M.M.S. Elvira
  • R.S.T. do Valle
Publication date 12-2021
Journal Environmental Research Letters
Article number 124025
Volume | Issue number 16 | 12
Number of pages 8
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Regional, Transnational and European Studies (ARTES)
Abstract
Consumer countries and blocs, including the UK and the EU, are defining legal measures to tackle deforestation linked to commodity imports, potentially requiring imported goods to comply with the relevant producer countries' land-use laws. Nonetheless, this measure is insufficient to address global deforestation. Using Brazil's example of a key exporter of forest-risk commodities, here we show that it has ∼3.25 Mha of natural habitat (storing ∼152.8 million tons of potential CO2 emissions) at a high risk of legal deforestation until 2025. Additionally, the country's legal framework is going through modifications to legalize agricultural production in illegally deforested areas. What was illegal may become legal shortly. Hence, a legality criterion adopted by consumer countries is insufficient to protect forests and other ecosystems and may worsen deforestation and conversion risks by incentivizing the weakening of social-environmental protection by producer countries.
Document type Article
Note With supplementary files
Language English
Related dataset Additional dataset to Trading deforestation—why the legality of forest-risk commodities is insufficient
Published at https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac358d
Other links https://zenodo.org/records/5675649#.YY0eomDMLIV
Downloads
Reis_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_124025 (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back