Bounding Program Benefits When Participation Is Misreported

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 01-2024
Journal Journal of Econometrics
Article number 105556
Volume | Issue number 238 | 1
Number of pages 14
Organisations
  • Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB) - Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute (ASE-RI)
Abstract
Instrumental variables (IV) are commonly used to estimate treatment effects in case of noncompliance. However, program participation is often misreported in survey data and standard techniques are not sufficient to point identify and consistently estimate the effects of interest. In this paper, we show that the identifiable IV estimand that ignores treatment misclassification is a weighted average of local average treatment effects with weights that can also be negative. This is troublesome because it may fail to deliver a correct causal interpretation, and this is true even if all the weights are non-negative. Therefore, we provide three IV strategies to bound the program benefits when both noncompliance and misreporting are present. We demonstrate the gain of identification power achieved by leveraging multiple exogenous variations when discrete or multiple-discrete IVs are available. At last, we use our new Stata command, ivbounds, to study the benefits of participating in the 401(k) pension plan on savings.
Document type Article
Note With supplementary file
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105556
Downloads
1-s2.0-S0304407623002725-main (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back