Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery

Open Access
Authors
  • Justin B. Miller
  • Gijs van Elswijk
Publication date 04-2020
Journal Frontiers in Psychology
Article number 770
Volume | Issue number 11
Number of pages 11
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract

Clinical practice still relies heavily on traditional paper-and-pencil testing to assess a patient’s cognitive functions. Digital technology has the potential to be an efficient and powerful alternative, but for many of the existing digital tests and test batteries the psychometric properties have not been properly established. We validated a newly developed digital test battery consisting of digitized versions of conventional neuropsychological tests. Two confirmatory factor analysis models were specified: a model based on traditional neuropsychological theory and expert consensus and one based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) taxonomy. For both models, the outcome measures of the digital tests loaded on the cognitive domains in the same way as established in the neuropsychological literature. Interestingly, no clear distinction could be made between the CHC model and traditional neuropsychological model in terms of model fit. Taken together, these findings provide preliminary evidence for the structural validity of the digital cognitive test battery.

Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084351621
Downloads
fpsyg-11-00770 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back