The Writing is on the Wall Proportionality of Border Controls within the Schengen Area

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 11-10-2021
Publisher Verfassungsblog
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Center for European Law and Governance (ACELG)
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Regional, Transnational and European Studies (ARTES)
Abstract
On 6 October 2021, Advocate General (AG) Saugmandsgaard Øe published his Opinion in the joined cases C-368/20 NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark and C-369/20 NW v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Leibnitz. As discussed in our previous blog post outlining the facts and the legal questions of the case, the cases concern the legality – and limits – of introducing border controls within the Schengen Area. Six Schengen countries (Germany, France, Austria, Denmark, Norway and Sweden) have reintroduced border controls over the past years. If the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) were to follow the AG’s Opinion, they would need to seriously rethink their practices in this regard. New evidence-based procedures and serious reasons, capable of passing a proportionality test, would be necessary to introduce border controls within the Schengen Zone.
Document type Web publication or website
Language English
Related publication Schengen Restored
Published at https://doi.org/10.17176/20211011-181754-0
Published at https://verfassungsblog.de/the-writing-is-on-the-wall/
Downloads
The_Writing_is_on_the_Wall (Other version)
Permalink to this page
Back