Polarity sensitivity of question embedding: experimental evidence

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2018
Journal Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory
Event 28th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference
Volume | Issue number 28
Pages (from-to) 217-232
Organisations
  • Interfacultary Research - Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC)
Abstract
Attitude predicates can be classified by the kinds of complements they can embed: declaratives, interrogatives or both. However, several authors have claimed that predicates like be certain can only embed interrogatives in specific environments. According to Mayr, these are exactly the environments that license negative polarity items (NPIs). In his analysis, both NPIs and embedded interrogatives are licensed by the same semantic strengthening procedure. If this is right, one would expect a correlation between acceptability of be certain whether and NPIs. The analysis also predicts a contrast between antecedents vs. consequents of conditionals and restrictors vs. scopes of universal quantifiers. This paper tests these predictions experimentally through an acceptability judgment task. We find that judgments for be certain whether do not correlate with judgments on NPIs, which suggests that be certain whether and NPIs are in fact licensed by different mechanisms.
Document type Article
Note Proceedings of the 28th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge May 18-20, 2018, edited by Sireemas Maspong, Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir, Katherine Blake and Forrest Davis.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4424
Downloads
4424-6835-1-PB (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back