Teaching Comparative History of Political Philosophy
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2023 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Pluralizing Philosophy’s Past |
| Book subtitle | New Reflections in the History of Philosophy |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Chapter | 12 |
| Pages (from-to) | 163-178 |
| Publisher | Cham: Palgrave Macmillan |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | The main aim of this chapter is to provide a conceptual framework that makes a genuinely comparative survey of the history of political theory/philosophy [hereafter HOP] possible. At present, in political science and philosophy departments, there are survey courses in HOP that cover, roughly, works from Plato to Max Weber. Such courses, and the survey works they rely upon, are generally Eurocentric and mostly male dominated. This chapter discusses two kinds of obstacles to developing a comparative survey of HOP and then discusses the opportunities a comparative HOP generates. |
| Document type | Chapter |
| Note | Correction published online, 05 May 2023. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13405-0_12 |
| Other links | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13405-0_17 |
| Downloads |
978-3-031-13405-0_12
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
