Resolution of conflict between goal-directed actions: outcome encoding and neural control processes

Authors
  • S. de Wit ORCID logo
  • S.B. Ostlund
  • B.W. Balleine
  • A. Dickinson
Publication date 2009
Journal Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
Volume | Issue number 35 | 3
Pages (from-to) 382-393
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
According to O-R theory of instrumental learning, incongruent biconditional discriminations should be impossible to solve in a goal-directed manner because the event acting as the outcome of one response also acts as a discriminative stimulus for an opposite response. Each event should therefore be associated with two competing responses. However, Dickinson and de Wit (2003) have presented evidence that rats can learn incongruent discriminations. The present study investigated whether rats were able to engage additional processes to solve incongruent discriminations in a goal-directed manner. Experiment 1 provides evidence that rats resolve the response conflict that arises in the incongruent discrimination by differentially encoding events in their roles as discriminative stimulus and as outcome. Furthermore, Experiment 2 shows that once goal-directed control has been established the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex is not directly involved in its maintenance but rather plays a central role in conflict resolution processes.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014793
Permalink to this page
Back