Representativeness of participants in a randomized controlled trial on modalities of monitoring oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use

Open Access
Authors
  • Laura Blitz
  • Jean-Marie Brand
  • Colette Van Bokhoven
  • Joey Woudstra
  • Koenraad Vermey
  • Sophie Boers
  • Maudy Sluimer
  • Hannelore M. Götz
  • Anders Boyd
  • Lotte Werner
  • Maaike L. Soors d'Ancona
  • Frenk Van Harreveld
  • Maria Prins
  • Elske Hoornenborg
  • Udi Davidovich ORCID logo
  • Vita W. Jongen
Publication date 13-04-2026
Journal AIDS Research and Therapy
Article number 68
Volume | Issue number 231 | 1
Number of pages 13
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
Background: We assessed whether participants in the EZI-PrEP study, a non-inferiority trial evaluating online and six-monthly monitoring of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), represent the broader population of PrEP users in the Netherlands.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using routinely collected data from September 2021 to August 2022 at four centres for sexual health (CSHs) in the Netherlands. Socio-demographic characteristics, sexual behaviour, and prevalence of bacterial STIs were compared between EZI-PrEP participants at baseline and other PrEP users during their first PrEP monitoring visit during the same period.
Results: The analysis included 469 EZI-PrEP participants and 5161 other PrEP users, of whom 99% and 96% were men who have sex with men (MSM), respectively. EZI-PrEP participants were less often transgender or gender-divers persons (TGDP) (1% vs. 4%, p < 0.001), older (median age = 36 vs. 34 years, p = 0.004), more often born in the Netherlands (68% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), and more often completed a university/college degree (81% vs. 76%, p = 0.01). They also reported more group sex (38% vs. 33%, p = 0.023) and condomless anal sex (95% vs. 92%, p = 0.004), but less often sex work (1% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Prevalence of bacterial STIs were no different between groups (19% vs. 18%, p = 0.77).
Conclusions: The comparable STI prevalence suggests no difference in risk for HIV acquisition among EZI-PrEP participants and other PrEP users, making study outcomes applicable to a broader population of PrEP users. However, under-representation of TGDPs, sex workers, individuals not born in the Netherlands, and individuals without university or college degree may limit generalizability.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-026-00886-1 (Final published version)
Downloads
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back