The Fallacy of Continuity, on the references to Aristotle in Arendt and Agamben
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2011 |
| Journal | Ethic@ |
| Volume | Issue number | 10 | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 223-253 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Agamben characterizes in Homo Sacer the modern state in terms of biopolitics, referring to the theories of Arendt and Foucault. Agamben takes up in this context on a very influential interpretation of Aristotle by Arendt. Arendt maintains in this reference to Aristotle a false idea of continuity and ignores the fact that - as Foucault shows - at the end of the eighteenth century an inherent connection was established between a completely new type of rationality, governing and the state. There is therefore an ontological difference between the ancient and modern era and this has - as will be shown in this article - far reaching consequences for the key-concepts of Homo Sacer such as bare life, sovereignty and law. The recent development of globalization gives new relevance to this ontological difference, especially by undermining absolute state-sovereignty.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2011v10n2p223 |
| Downloads |
23080-74940-1-PB
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |