L.A. van der Ark
- Comparing estimation methods for categorical marginal models
- Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics
- Pages (from-to)
- Document type
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
- Research Institute of Child Development and Education (RICDE)
Categorical marginal models are flexible models for modelling dependent or clustered categorical data which do not involve any specific assumptions about the nature of the dependencies. Categorical marginal models are used for different purposes, including hypothesis testing, assessing model fit, and regression problems. Two different estimation methods are used to estimate marginal models: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized estimating equations (GEE). We explored three different cases to find out to what extent the two types of estimation methods are appropriate for investigating different types of research questions. The results suggest that ML may be preferred for assessing model fit because GEE has limited fit indices, whereas both methods can be used to assess the effect of independent factors in regression. Moreover, ML is asymptotically efficient, while GEE loses efficiency when the working correlation matrix is not correctly specified. However, for parameter estimation in regression GEE is easier to apply from a computational perspective.
- go to publisher's site
- Proceedings title: Quantitative psychology research: The 78th annual meeting of the Psychometric Society
Place of publication: Cham [etc.]
Editors: R.E. Millsap, D.M. Bolt, L.A. van der Ark, W.-C. Wang
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.