- Media, issue information and the vote choice in a referendum campaign
- Book title
- Publizistik und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung: Festschrift für Wolfgang Donsbach
- Pages (from-to)
- Wiesbaden: Springer
- Document type
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)
Early theorists framed public opinion as an emergent product of broad discussion - emanating ideally from a debate open to wide popular participation, free-flowing and uncensored, and well-informed (Lasswell 1941; Price 1992; Price/Neijens 1997). However, early scientific analysts (e.g. Allport 1937) found the concept of public opinion as an "emergent product" of discussion difficult to grasp empirically and problematic in a number of respects. Over time, they came to accept mass survey data as the only workable empirical expression of public opinion (Key 1961; Converse 1987). The extent to which general population surveys provide valid measures of what has traditionally been defined as public opinion - grounded in public discussion and well-informed by debate - has been questioned by scholars of many stripes (Price & Neijens 1998; Crespi 1989; Saris/Sniderman 2004). Empirical evidence suggests that opinions given to pollsters and survey researchers are often unorganized, disconnected, individual responses that have not been influenced by public debate (Bishop/Oldendick/Tuchfarber/Bennet 1980).
- go to publisher's site
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.