- Political Communication with Animals
- Volume | Issue number
- 5 | 1
- Document type
- Faculty of Humanities (FGw)
- Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
In this article I sketch the outlines of a theory of political human-animal conversations, based on ideas about language that I borrow from Ludwig Wittgenstein’s later work, in particular his notion of language-games. I present this theory as a supplement to the political theory of animal rights Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka present in Zoopolis (2011). I will argue their political theory is an important step forward in the debate about animal rights, because it proposes to see animals as political actors, but it lacks a theory of political communication, which leads to conceptual and practical problems; if we see animals as political actors, we need to think about (human-) animal languages, political animal voice and human-animal conversations. This means we need to study human-animal language-games, it also means we also need to reconsider the meaning and scope of (political and non-political) concepts and institutions, as well as invent new concepts and institutions, together with the animals.
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.