M.M.J. van Ooyen-Houben
M. van der Giessen
- Samenvatting en conclusies
- Book title
- Het Besloten club- en het Ingezetenencriterium voor coffeeshops: evaluatie van de implementatie en de uitkomsten in de periode mei-november 2012: tussenrapportage
- Pages (from-to)
- Den Haag: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie
- Cahier WODC
- Volume | Edition (Serie)
- Document type
- Faculty of Law (FdR)
- Bonger Institute of Criminology (ARILS)
The private club and the residence criterion for Dutch coffeeshops: evaluation of the implementation and outcomes in the period May-November 2012: an interim report.
The Dutch coffeeshop policy became more restrictive on 1 January 2012. Two new criteria that coffeeshops must adhere to in order for them to be tolerated were added to the Opium Act Guidelines for the Public Prosecution Service: the private club [B] criterion and the residence [I] criterion. The B-criterion stipulated that coffeeshops could only permit access to, and sell to, registered coffeeshop members. Coffeeshops could furthermore only have a maximum of 2000 registered members per calendar year. The members had to be documented in a verifiable membership list. The I-criterion stipulated that only residents of the Netherlands would be allowed to become coffeeshop members and hence to enter the Dutch coffeeshops.
The implementation and consequences of the new criteria are being evaluated at the request of the Minister of Security and Justice. The current interim report covers the implementation process and outcomes of the two new criteria between May 2012 and November 2012. The criteria were enforced during this period only in the southern provinces of Limburg, Noord-Brabant and Zeeland.
This study examined whether the implementation processes were carried out as intended, whether the new policy achieved its goals, and to what extent an illegal market for cannabis (an anticipated adverse side-effect) emerged between 1 May and November 2012. The ‘intervention logic’ behind the B- and I- criteria was used as a framework for this evaluation. This ‘logic’ was reconstructed by the researchers from the available policy documentation and verified in interviews with the parties involved in the implementation of the two additional criteria.
For this evaluation, a sample was drawn consisting of seven southern municipalities where the criteria have been enforced since 1 May 2012 (the experimental group), and seven municipalities in the other provinces where the criteria were not enforced during the measurement period (the comparison group). Coffeeshop areas were selected within these municipalities where interviews and surveys were conducted with coffeeshop customers and local residents. Developments in the southern municipalities were compared with developments in the other provinces.
Two rounds of interviews have been conducted to assess the implementation process (with 40 and 36 key informants respectively). The interviews were conducted in the sample in the southern provinces with representatives of the national government (more specifically the Ministry of Security and Justice), the Board of Procurators General, the regional supporting body for the municipalities, the municipalities, the police, the district Public Prosecution Offices and the coffeeshop owners. The interviews took place during the initial period of the enforcement of the new criteria (May-August 2012) and after approximately six months (end of 2012).
In order to investigate the desired outcomes - reduced nuisance and drug tourism, smaller coffeeshops (as indicated by a reduced number of coffeeshop visits) accessible only to residents of the Netherlands - two measurements were performed: a baseline measurement and a first follow-up measurement. Survey respondents included coffeeshop visitors (n=1,051 at baseline and n=739 at the first follow-up) and local residents near coffeeshops in the selected coffeeshop areas (n=712 at baseline and n=714 at the first follow-up).
This evaluation did not measure potential effects on (organised) drug-related crime or whether the coffeeshops became more manageable. A separate evaluation would have to be conducted consulting different categories of participants and other sources in order to draw valid conclusions concerning these anticipated effects.
The consequences for the illegal cannabis consumer market were investigated using a street survey with cannabis users outside the designated coffeeshop areas (n=942 at baseline and n=812 at the first follow-up). This survey took place in the southern municipalities as well as in the rest of the country. In addition, 340 non-current and current users of cannabis - who all used cannabis during 2012 but had not used or bought cannabis in the month prior to the first follow-up - were surveyed during the first follow-up. The baseline measurements were completed prior to 1 May 2012, and the first follow-up measurement half a year later, in October-November 2012.
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.