Over the seventy-five years since its publication, scholars have continued to adjust and refine Professor Charles Haskins'
classic historiographical label ‘Renaissance of the twelfth century’. Nevertheless, the concept remains a useful springboard
with which to approach, understand, and explain the cultural changes, the accelerations, and the innovations that took place
in Western Europe in the course of the twelfth century. Yet, like any other conceptual tool, it has limits in scope that confine
its utility geographically and chronologically, as well as qualitative limitations in terms of the particular events and achievements
that are its raison d'être. Defining events, such as the flowering of dialectic or the coming of age of the study and production
of canon law, coincided with each other only in certain places and at given times. Portugal is one place where such a conjunction
of events and achievements never occurred. Portugal, in other words, did not have a Renaissance in the way imagined by Haskins
for medieval Europe.
This fact should be of some consequence for Portuguese history, since the twelfth century is
the country's century of birth. To be born in the age of Abelard, Gratian, or Azo might be auspicious, were it not for the
fact that all three — as well as every major intellectual figure of the twelfth-century Renaissance — led their lives and
produced their works far from Portugal and without any attestable connection to it. Of course, their work and the work of
other leading figures of the Renaissance of the twelfth century did reach Portugal, but it did so unevenly and piecemeal.
Gratian’s magnum opus was known in Portugal by the second half of the twelfth century, as was the theology of St Bernard and
Hugh of St Victor, but it is highly doubtful that Abelard’s ever was.