- Should the European Union Ratify the European Convention for Human Rights? Some Remarks on the Relations between the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice
- Book title
- Constituting Europe: the European Court of Human Rights in a national, European and global context
- Pages (from-to)
- Number of pages
- Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Studies in human rights conventions
- Volume | Edition (Serie)
- Document type
- Faculty of Law (FdR)
- Amsterdam Center for European Law and Governance (ACELG)
This chapter focuses on the relationship between the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the European Union, especially the European Court of Justice (ECJ). It assesses whether the EU should accede to the ECHR - and subsequently whether the parties to the ECHR and accession agreement should ratify it.
It sketches the hesitations of the ECJ from its initial sub-ECHR standard review of fundamental rights complaints to its interventions in the accession negotiation debates, jealously protective of its 'prerogatives' within the EU institutional architecture. The latter have led to over-complicated special provisions for the EU, especially the so-called 'prior involvement procedure' and also the 'co-respondent procedure'. These are clear evidence that the EU institutions, the ECJ included, have privileged their institutional prerogatives over the value accession would have for the protection of the fundamental rights of EU citizens. It is explained why the accession is nevertheless a good idea.
- go to publisher's site
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library, or send a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.